|
|
Post by Padres GM (Scott) on Jun 2, 2019 15:59:43 GMT
Please post eligible players here.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Sox (Miketron) on Jun 6, 2019 12:30:07 GMT
Zach Plesac (SB)
Devin Smeltzer (SB)
|
|
|
|
Post by Athletics GM (Gaz) on Jun 6, 2019 13:14:24 GMT
Zack Cozart
Marco Estrada
Harold Ramirez (SB)
Cesar Puello (SB)
Luis Arraez (SB)
Charlie Tilson
Sam Gaviglio
|
|
|
|
Post by Phillies GM (Chuck) on Jun 6, 2019 18:33:16 GMT
Aaron Bummer
Matt Shoemaker
Eric Sogard (SB)
Tim Locastro (SB)
Mike Yastrzemski (SB)
Josh VanMeter (SB)
|
|
|
|
Post by TSS League Office on Jun 10, 2019 3:12:37 GMT
Zach Plesac
A’s 9 SB - Winner
Mets 5.5 SB
White Sox 4 SB
Red Sox 2.5 SB
Mariners 1.6 SB
Dodgers .6 SB
Devin Smeltzer
Mariners .8 SB - Winner
White Sox .5 SB
Dodgers .3 SB
Harold Ramirez
Pirates 2.5 SB - Winner
Dodgers .7 SB
Cesar Puello
Dodgers .2 SB - Winner
Luis Arraez
Dodgers .7 SB - Winner
Josh Van Meter
Dodgers .2 SB - Winner
Aaron Bummer
Dodgers 1 yr .6, AAS .6 - Winner
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2019 10:45:24 GMT
Will be interested to see how the SB dollars are used. Not clear on whether $10M is the limit or owners can bid using salary cap money to acquire prospects -- and when how that works. Does the payment fund have to be specified at the time of the bid?
|
|
|
|
Post by Athletics GM (Gaz) on Jun 10, 2019 11:04:42 GMT
Didn't realise we couldn't use our remaining salary. Just re-read the rules. Oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2019 11:33:38 GMT
We're not so clear on the rule. Seems designed to keep owners from bidding heavily on prospects. Ten million doesn't go very far. Pretty skimpy amount for team building.
At first we thought teams could use the Salary Cap $$ but would have to specify you were doing so. On re-reading, this does not appear to be the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by Padres GM (Scott) on Jun 10, 2019 16:20:49 GMT
We're not so clear on the rule. Seems designed to keep owners from bidding heavily on prospects. Ten million doesn't go very far. Pretty skimpy amount for team building.
At first we thought teams could use the Salary Cap $$ but would have to specify you were doing so. On re-reading, this does not appear to be the case.
The pool amount of $10m is quite irrelevant to how far you can go to acquire the prospects that are eligible for bidding. What is relevant is that you have the same 1/30th shopping power for these players as does everyone else. Your bid is essentially a share of the total pool. Someone bidding $1m on a player is essentially saying I bid 1/10th of my allotment toward this player. I could make it $100m each and the only thing that changes is that someone previously bidding $1m would now bid $10m understanding they are competing in a larger raw pool amount but would still be bidding the same 1/10th of their pool. The rule in place is intended to do the following: Give everyone equal access to bid on prospects that are unowned and have been called up. Ensure players unowned that are called up have a mechanism to be rostered. Preserve value in the annual FYPD by allocating unowned prospects who have not accrued ML time to the FYPD. |
|
